Community commitment: the relationship between corporations and communities

by Yasuhiro Morii

Introduction: What is corporate social responsibility? The basic concept of corporate social responsibility is an obligation beyond that required by the law and economics, to pursue long-term goals that are good for society. Usually, socially responsible companies are expected to be profitable (carry their own weight or fulfill their economic responsibilities), to obey the law (fulfill their legal responsibilities), to engage in ethical behavior (be responsive to their ethical responsibilities), and to give back through philanthropy (engage in corporate contributions). In the last forty years the concept of business social responsibility has continued to evolve and expand. Today, corporations have been expected to assume more voluntary social programs. Many corporations have come to grips with those programs, but some corporations have misunderstood the meaning of social responsibility. They use the word ³Corporate Social Responsibility² as a slogan or for their profitability. For example, one company stated on their ads ³We Care for Our Environment² but they never act or respond to it. Robert F. Scherer and Crystal L. Owen, stated in their article, ³Consumers tend to buy the products of a corporation that they perceive to be socially responsible. In 1991, 45.6% of respondents to a national survey said that they would buy from a company that contributes to charity.² This survey clearly identify why those corporations attempt to be socially responsible. This is one of the reasons why I decide for this research into corporate social responsibility. Although, I knew many corporations that operate good or bad manners, finding socially responsible companies was a time-consuming process, because there is no official guidelines to define what socially responsible is. For example, Company A donates a lot of charitable funds to the white community but does not do anything for the black community. Some scholars might say Company A is a socially responsible because of its donations to the white community. This example may remind you of the article, ³Political Aftershocks² in Ecology of Fear. In the article, many people who live in Beverly Hills received FEMA grants, but most of the people who live in Crenshaw District could not receive FEMA grants. You might think this is an unfair treatment, but some scholars may say what the government had done was socially responsible. Another purpose of this project is to find the companies that operate in a socially responsible manner and define the relationship between those companies and the communities. I asked some of my classmates about this social responsibility issue and I found out that most of them believe that almost every corporation contributes to their communities for profitability. Then I asked myself, ³Why they do not believe the existence of corporations which operate in socially responsible manner?² I think those people who do not know about corporate social responsibility can not get any information of good corporations, because unlike those bad corporations, good corporations do not advertise their community contributions. I decided to choose two companies, Bank of America and Citizens Bank of Canada, because it may convenient for understand their community contributions by comparing each company. The first task for this project was to identify which communities or people can be affected by these banks. Bank of America operates in the southwestern states, mainly in California, therefore most of the Bank of Americaıs contributions are specially designed for the communities in California. But once the merger with Nations Bank completes successfully, Bank of America will affect communities nationwide. Unlike Bank of America, Citizens Bank is very small and new, but its operation is very unique. Citizens Bank does not have any branches or the bank provide services either by Internet, fax, or telephone. Therefore, its customers are not only the Canadians but also from many other countries. But, the bank mainly provides the services to Canadians. In the following sections, I would like to describe and analyze each bankıs community contributions and state some references which relate to these banks activity. Bank of America: Among the ten leading employers in the five county area, Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernadino and Ventura counties, the first four employers are all government organizations and Bank of America is the fifth leading employers in the area. More precisely, Bank of America has largest employees among non-government organizations. As of March 1996, Bank of America has 26,563 employees in those five counties and approximately two third of the total employees work in Los Angeles County. This information indicates that what Bank of America can affect significantly our daily lives. Although most U.S. companies didnıt consider of corporate social responsibility as necessary during the early 1900s, Bank of America was the one of the few companies who knew the importance of what a corporation should do for community. A. P. Giannini, founder of Bank of America, stated in 1940, ³In everything we do we are actuated by one motive ­ to build our neighborhood, our community and our state. In that way we are building a better America.² This was the base of the bankıs philosophy. Giannini was the hero among immigrants, farmers, and laborers, because he was the only one who lent the money to those people. When he made a loan, he always looked an applicantıs hand. If the hands were calloused, he figured the person is working, and he loaned money. This was the Bank of America when it was first established. But time has been changed. As the bank has grown, Gianniniıs philosophy has disappeared. Unfortunately, some of the Bank of Americaıs community commitments are not within the scope of corporate social responsibility. Using corporate responsibility as their slogan is one of their strategies, and some of their programs were just designed to meet requirements under the certain regulations. Under the Community Reinvestment Act, all the depository institutions have to help meet the credit needs of the communities in which they operate. The goal of this act is to make sure that the financial needs of the low- and moderate- income neighborhoods are being met. It is important to mention some of Bank of Americaıs community commitment programs. These programs are such as ³The Volunteer Time for the Schools Program² which provides the opportunity for associates (they call their employee ³associate²) to volunteer up to two hours a week of paid time in K-12 public or private schools. In the association with Housing and Urban Development committee, they provide ³Neighborhood Advantage Program,² which helps low- and moderate- income people (income less than $39,840 in Los Angeles limitations may vary among other states) who wants to buy a house. This program includes zero down payment home loans to help people own a house much easier. Also, the company has recently announced a 350 billion dollar, ten-year commitment to community development lending and investment. The program includes specific lending and investment goals for affordable housing, small business, consumer lending, and economic development. Also, as a part of the commitment, the company pledges to acquire, build, or rehabilitate 50,000 affordable housing units during the next ten years. Two main programs are the following on which the company spends a tremendous effort to make a better community they deserve a closer look: (1) Community Catalyst Program and (2) Beyond Sprawl. (1) Community Catalyst Program: this charitable contribution is especially designed for Los Angeles County, which is often known as a melting-pot society. In 1997, the company announced plans of an 80% increase in contributions in Los Angeles County including $5 million contribution for the Walt Disney Concert Hall in downtown Los Angeles. Also, the company established a new program called ²Community Catalyst Award² which started this year. This new program has given an unrestricted $5,000 donation to non-profit community-based organizations each week throughout this year. The main purpose of this program is not only to recognize outstanding examples of grass-roots community development but also to help minorities, homeless, youth people who are struggling to. The nominees have to meet some of the following requirements to be eligible:  Creating jobs for the unemployed (including job placement services with post-employment support to clients).  Providing job training services to the unskilled and under-skilled.  Producing affordable housing for low-income and homeless families and individuals.  Increasing home ownership opportunities for first-time home buyers.  Providing child care development services linked to support family services.  Improving neighborhood infrastructure or environment.  Helping families to move from public assistance to gainful employment.  Organizing and developing local leadership in neighborhoods and neighborhood networks.  Improving local educational performance. Note: < http://www.bankamerica.com> Some of the recipients of this award can give you some indication of what Bank of Americaıs purpose. Actually, you can categorize those recipients into three organizations; (a) creating jobs or providing job training to homeless and young people to help them return to the economic mainstream, (b) to providing or produce affordable housing for low-income and homeless people, not only to improve their living, but also to develop their self-esteem, (c) providing educational opportunities to minorities and young people. (a) The Los Angeles Free Clinicıs Project STEP; project STEP (Short Term Employment Program) provides job training, job search and retention workshops, and coordinated case management for homeless and especially for runaway youth in the Hollywood area, which is sometimes described as ³ground zero² for the local runaway and homeless youth population. Their goal is to build their self-sufficiency and help them off the streets. Recall from the article, ³Half-moon of repression,² the article discusses about a group called the Peopleıs Republic which goal is to banish the homeless from sight. The Peopleıs Republic is a complete contrast to the STEP. Other recipients who categorized in this type of organizations are Gramercy Housing Group, A Place Called Home, and etc. (b) Habitat for Humanity/High School Initiative; the main purpose of this program is to provide affordable houses to low-income families and to encourage high school students to get involve with the community. A selected family who will receive a zero-interest, 20-year mortgage loan provided by Habitat and those payments will be reinvested for other projects. Actually, this program established only a year ago. In June 1998, after nearly a year of fund-raising, students from six Los Angeles area high schools started to build their first home in South Central Los Angeles. It took them nearly three months to complete their mission. After the completion of their first home, they are looking forward to turn this trend into a nationwide campaign. Other organizations within this category are Upward Bound House, Portals, and etc. (c) Centro Latino de Educacion Popular; this program was designed to provide service for illiterate Latino adults. Their mission is to help them improve their English skills and other functional skills. By improving their skills, the organization seeks to open the door for further education and an improved standard of living. Other organizations within this category are Korean American Coalition, Youth Employment Systems/YouthBuild, and etc. (2) Beyond Sprawl: this is a joint report sponsored by Bank of America and association with the California Resources Agency, Greenbelt Alliance, and the Low Income Housing Fund. This report calls for a ³new sense of urgency² about managing growth in California in order to improve the stateıs competitiveness and quality of life. The report stated that, ²We are no longer afford the luxury of sprawl. Our demographics are shifting in dramatic ways. Our economy is restructuring. Our environment is under increasing stress. We cannot shape Californiaıs future successfully unless we move beyond sprawl² and also, ³it is meant as a wake-up call to all Californians that the sprawl issue has a new urgency in the state, and that all of us can play a role in addressing the problem.² This report argues that if the current trend does not change, the negative effect of sprawl could become be significant. For example, because of the increase of dependency on the automobile, the cost of air pollution has increased. Furthermore, due to the sprawl, driving distance and hours have increased. According to the report ³The South Coast Air Quality Management District estimated that air pollution in the four-county Los Angeles area costs $7.4 billion per year, or about $600 per resident.² Also, they believe that sprawl will lure middle-class residents from older neighborhoods and will create destructive economic segregation and robs social stability of those neighborhoods and the distribution of income will also become more skewed, becoming increasingly difficult for low-income people to escape poverty. Therefore, in order to resolve these problems and many others, they hope that immediate actions should be taken, including increased investment of capital and resources in inner cities and older suburban areas, especially investments that create new jobs: higher-density development on the suburban fringe; and requiring new developments at the metropolitan fringe to pay their full cost, including costs associated with new road construction, development of new water supplies, and mitigation of environmental problems. So far details of Bank of Americaıs community contributions have been explained. Most the people might think their commitment is socially responsible, but there are a few articles which state that its commitments are not socially responsible. Bank of America has only two minorities among its thirty directors, and there are only two African-Americans, two Hispanics, and two Asians among its 100 managers. This fact indicates that the bankıs decisions are made by white-oriented value judgment. A good example is that less than one-half of one percent of the dollar value of the loan portfolios of Bank of America was invested in African-American communities in 1990. More precisely, more than 99% of their loans were invested in other than African-American areas. Actually, this is a common practice among financial institutions in California. For example, Mitsui Manufactures Bank, the U.S. subsidiary of the Japanese bank, and the worldıs second largest bank, admitted that it had made no home and business loans to African-Americans. Also, there are no African-Americans or Hispanics on its board of directors and none of the seventy-seven business people on its California advisory boards was a minority. But, recently, this trend has been changed. Including Bank of America, many financial institutions have found profitability by lending to small business and minorities, including African-Americans. They are also recognizing that grass-roots lending to poor communities can be a sustainable, attractive and profitable portfolio option. There are some reasons for these changes. First, California and the Western states, driven by new small businesses, are once again leading the U.S. economy in growth. Second, those financial institutions realized that lending in low-income communities has as a good record on repayments as do that in wealthier neighborhoods. For example, Family Savings holds $270 million in mortgagees, 85% of them in central Los Angeles, and there is no greater loss ratio than in any other Southern California area. Los Angeles Times. Sep 25, 1997, reported that Bank of America pledged $140 billion in loans over 10 years to lower-income and minority borrowers, but this is not charity, just good business. Also, the lenders or financial institutions typically commit to community loan programs when they want support for a merger or acquisition. Thatıs been the case in 1992, which Bank of America promised to lend $12.1 billion in low- and moderate-income areas over 10 years as a condition of its merger with Security Pacific Bank. Moreover, this commitment was not made voluntarily. Actually, Bank of America was forced to pledge this lending by the Greenlining Coalition, a California coalition of sixteen major organizations representing African-Americans, Asians, Hispanics, small businesses, churches, consumers, the disabled, women, and veterans. Although the commitment was not voluntarily set, it was fulfilled in less than five years. Based on that experience, Bank of America decided that lending to lower-income borrowers was profitable and could be done with an acceptable level of risk. According to Bank of America, ³May 20, 1998, Bank of America has announced a $350 billion, 10-year commitment to community development lending and investment, by far the largest and most comprehensive program ever for community development lending by a United States bank.² This commitment also serves the same purpose of. The reason for this commitment is most likely because of the current merger process between Bank of America and Nations Bank (As of November 1998, the merger has been approved by the Justice Department). The employees of Bank of America tend to just let the customers wait in a long line, because they see the customers as numbers in front of them. Also, Consumer Reports, stated that including Bank of America, there are nine banks in California which offers a checking account that charge a fee for in-branch deposit or withdraw. It is almost impossible to find this type of checking account in any other state. Although Bank of America has other kinds of checking accounts, the bank should not have such checking accounts, if the company is really trying to contribute to the communities. Fortunately, this trend has been changing. In 1997, Bank of America launched a $60 million-plus advertising campaign, in order to change its impersonal image. The new campaign has been more focused on consumers as individuals than previous ads, ³Banking on America.² Their new slogan is ³How can we help with the next 50 years?² According to Marnie Delaney, Bank of America senior vice president and director of advertising, ³We need to demonstrate we understand what is going on in peopleıs lives and show we have the desire to help at a time when people are pretty confused.² Also, as a part of the campaign, employees were asked to view an eleven-minute videotape, which encourages them to see customers as individuals and to understand their needs. According to Dalaney, ³We want our employees to think about customers not just as numbers in front of you but as people who have just gotten married, or as people who have had experiences employees can identify with.² In order to find out about the bankıs current conditions, I attempted to collect some information from Bank of America by sending e-mail with some questions. Unfortunately, the bank has never replied. Perhaps the questions were perceived is too critical. Instead of collecting data from Bank of America, I decided to make a questionnaire (See Appendix A) and asked ten customers of the bank to answer the questions. In order to make abroad survey, questionnaires were taken in two different time ranges. The first five questionnaires were taken from 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM, and rest were taken from 2:00PM to 4:00PM. Also, the majority of people who cooperated with these questionnaires was women. The reason for this is probably because of the time range. While I was taking the questionnaire from a lady, either Caucasian or Hispanic and around mid-forties, she started asking me questions about what I know about Bank of America. I was so confused, but I explained to her about the bank. Then she told me, ³I think I should consider taking out all of my little savings from them.² Statistically, it is not reliable to make decisions based on the ten questionnaires, but I believe that Bank of Americaıs service has not been changed yet. Probably their services need more improvement. Two articles contrary to those ten questionnaires were found. Both were issued by research corporations which mainly research for companies, which relate to the corporate social responsibility issues. One company has stated that Bank of America is one of the 100 Best Corporate Citizens and 75 Best Companies for Hispanic Opportunity. Another company has stated that Bank of America is one of the honor-roll companies. Although I do not have a good impression towards their community commitments, I somewhat agree with their report, ³Beyond Sprawl.² This report reminds me of two articles in Ecology of Fear: ³Greening the Urban Desert² and ³The Last landscape.² Both articles criticize urbanization. Some scholars have argued that if the state carries out Beyond Sprawlıs plan, the cost would hurt the state. But we have to act now, instead of passing this problem to future generations. Citizens Bank of Canada: Citizens Bank was formed by Vancouver City Savings Credit Union (VanCity), the largest credit union in Canada. Citizens Bank is not only the newest national bank but also it is the first branchless bank in Canada. The bank also provides financial services 24-hours a day, seven days a week. Credit Union Management. Dec 1996, reported, ³Richard Wafer, Vice president of Vancouver City Savings Credit Union, has argued that Citizens Bank of Canada will use technology to provide a lower-cost alternative to existing banks that carry heavy branch networks.² It might be true that the bank is using a lower-cost alternative, but if the bank provides better service by cutting its cost, that is a form of corporate social responsibility. Jim Lyon stated, ³Citizens Bank has a solid reputation for leadership in corporate responsibility.² When Citizens Bank first set out to create a new bank, they had a clear idea that they didnıt want to be just another financial institutions. This is one of the reasons why the bank is operated based on corporate social responsibility. According to Citizens Bank, ³The concept of Corporate Responsibility is the cornerstone of our operations. And as such, it affects and is reflected in everything we do. Every decision we make. Every action we take. It is also reflected in the banking products we develop, and how they can be used in positive ways. It involves the relationship we have with our employees and the kind of workplace and culture we are creating together. It defines the partnership we have with our members, and how we encourage members to have a voice in our operations and the direction we take ­ what issues we support, what actions we take to address them.² In order to be a socially responsible bank and to be a new way of banking institution, the bank place great emphasize on their objectives; (1) to create better workplace for their employees, (2) to put its memberıs voice back into banking, and (3) to disclose its activities to the public. (1) Work place. The bank has striven to design its workplace in a manner comfortable and efficient for all employees. Their work philosophy is based on the principles of democracy, equality, and respect for individuals. Therefore, the bank works with a non-hierarchical structure. More precisely, the bank place great value on teamwork, open communication, and collaboration. A company who has this type of structure can grow rapidly. Starbucks is a good example. This chain stores became a big company in rapid pace, because it had non- hierarchical structure. Also, Citizens Bank has many programs, which provide better a workplace for its employees. Examples are tuition reimbursement for secondary education, employee assistance and legal referral, superior vacation entitlement, flexible work schedules, and so on. According to Citizens Bank, ³human relations is about more than policies or programs or pay checks. Itıs about working together to build a workplace in which everyone is able to meet their personal goals, and everyoneıs involvement contributes to our success.² (2) Memberıs Voice. Citizens Bank believes that people want their voice heard in banking. Therefore, the bank has made peopleıs opinions a key part of its commitment to being a leader in corporate social responsibility. In 1997, in order to bring this commitment to life, Citizens Bank sponsored its first forum in four major Canadian cities. The purpose of the forum is to share with people, including its members, about how corporations affect families, communities, the environment, and the country. Each forum had a different focus: how people and communities are coming together and sharing ideas for the childrenıs futures, how corporations are redefining and expanding the concept of corporate social responsibility and how business can play a major role in the socially and environmentally sustainable, how individuals and communities must begin to assume greater responsibility for themselves. Some corporations have forums, but the objectives are somewhat different from that of Citizens Bankıs. Their objectives are either to advertise their operations or to acquire new customers. Unlike those corporations, the main purpose of Citizens Bankıs forum is to listen the voice of its customers and communities. (3) Public Disclosure. When the bank started their service, it set high expectations for itself, because the bank wanted to be a new kind of bank which listens to members and is actively involved in supporting positive social changes. Due to its high expectations, the bank decided to create its own report card. By disclosing their report card to the public, the bank can get feedback and evaluation from the public. Based on this feedback and evaluation, the bank can improve its service and products. This is the most unique attempt ever taken by a financial institution. The guideline of the report card was based on the Guidelines for Corporate Social Performance published in 1997 by the Canadian Business for Social Responsibility (CBSR) and was conducted the review by CoreRelations Consulting which specializing in monitoring and managing corporate social performance. Their social report card measures their performance in certain key areas. Those areas are such that community development, diversity, employee relations, environment, international relationships, markets practices, and fiscal responsibility. The scoring system which laid out in the CBSR guidelines, is based on three levels:  0. This indicates that the policy / program does not exist at the company. It may also highlight a poor performance record in the subject area.  1. This score indicates that the policy / program is in the development or implementation phase. It may also highlight an average performance record in the subject area.  2. This score indicates that the policy / program is in place at the company. It may also highlight an excellent performance record in the subject area. Note: The following sections provide a brief description of the scores which they received, and evaluations of those scores. Also, five out of nine sections were chosen due to its significance: Community Development: This section contains three categories, community involvement, donations, and community economic development. The bank has received high scores in this section, except in the sub-category, employee volunteer initiatives (paid by company). The low score (0) in the sub-category reflect that the bank did not pay the wages of these volunteers, and currently there is no policy in place to support paid volunteer activities. But many employees donate their time voluntarily to the community. Also, its overall high scores in the rest reflect its commitment to listen to their members and communities. Most of all, the high score in donation indicates that its contributions are charity, not business. Diversity: This section contains two categories, Internal and External Equal Opportunity. The bank received high score for Internal and an average score for External. One reason for the high score in Internal Equal Opportunity is that they limit the CEOıs salary to be no more than ten times than that of its average employee. Compared to other bankıs CEOs, this amount is very low. Usually those banksı CEOs receive more than 20 times than that of average employee. Employee Relations: there are five categories in this section. The scores were average to high. The bank received a high score in Employee Growth part and this result reflects that the bank emphasizes its human relation programs. Environment: The bank received a high score for this section, because its commitment to the environment is excellent. For example, in 1997 Citizens Bank was awarded by the Canadian Direct Marketing Association for minimizing waste and using recycled materials. According to the Citizens Bank, ³In 1997 regular-sized garbage cans were replaced with small desktop Œmini-binsı. Desk-side garbage was reduced by 50% at our head office as a result.² Also, for the purpose of environment conservation, the bank is planning to make a transportation policy which would encourage employees to exchange their monthly parking fee for monthly transit passes. Market Conduct: within this section, there is a sub-category called Code of ethics in place. Under the CBSR guidelines, it is defined as meeting or exceeding Code of Ethics of Better Business Bureau. The bank received an average score in this part. Actually, this is very unusual for a socially responsible company. Usually if a company is socially responsible, its code of ethics should be well established or excellent. According to Citizens Bank, ³We currently have a code of ethics in place for internal workplace issues. We promote ethically screened financial products, and we screen the companies on our direct bill payment system for certain market practices we do not support. Our intention is to slowly broaden our screening over time.² Citizens Banks also makes charitable donations. Since its service has begun from last year, the bank has only one program called ²Shared Interest Fund². The main purpose of this donation is not only to support groups who are working for the communities, but also the bank wants its members and cardholders to be a part of its commitment. This program is also a unique attempt of Citizens Bank. A typical bank donates charitable funds from its profit (it is tax deductible, meaning that the bank do not spend even a penny). According to Citizens Bank, ³The funds we earmark for social causes are from revenues, not profits. This is an important distinction because it means that we will contribute to the social causes fund regardless of whether we realize a profit in a given year. All the money in our shared Interest Funds is contributed by Citizens Bank.² The Shared Interest Fund unique features, the way of raising founds and the way of selecting nominees. Every time a customer uses his or her Shared Interest Visa card, Citizens Bank will deposit 10 cents into the fund, and the bank also deposits $1 for every $1,000 deposit made at the bank. Moreover, the bank will deposit $50 for each new mortgage. The way of selecting the nominees is unique, because nomination is based on its customersı and cardholdersı vote. First, the bank collects the vote and then its Advisory Committee (including bank members, employees, representatives of community groups) will narrow it down to four groups. Also, the group with the most votes will receive 50% of the total. Then second, third, and fourth will receive 25%, 15%, and 10% respectively. Each nominee will be chosen based upon its ability to:  Match the description given for one of the areas of concern, either the environment, economic self-reliance, human rights and international co-operation or community and family health.  Demonstrate its impact on the local level, with proven relevance to individuals across Canada.  Meet the needs and expectations of Citizens Bank Œs members and VISA cardholders.  Play a role in developing vibrant, healthy and safe communities. Note: this information was quoted from Citizens Bank of Canada 1997 Annual Report. In 1997, the total found was $25,000 and four organizations were awarded from each four categories. First recipient, Amnesty International was awarded from Human Rights, Second recipient, The Evergreen Foundation, was awarded from Environment, third recipient, Society of St. Vincent de Paul, was awarded from Families, and fourth recipient, Canadian Womenıs Foundation was awarded from Economic Self-Reliance category. In order to get more information about this program and the bankıs reputations, I sent e-mail to each recipients of the Shared Interest Award (See Appendix B). Two out of four recipients replied to my questions. One of my questions was ³Do you think Citizens Bank has a solid reputations for leadership in corporate responsibility? If you think itıs true, can you tell me why?.² Both of them answered yes and the reasons are such that their strong policies, and the aspects of their commitment to non-profit organizations. Shannon Doherty, a representative of Canadian Womenıs Foundation, stated in the replied mail, ³They have a definite focus on NPOıs as a sector which is unique to the banking business.² So far, I have explained about the Citizens Bankıs community contributions. Now I would like to specify some contrasts between the two banks. First, unlike Bank of Americaıs community programs, the purpose of Citizens Bankıs programs is clearly and explicitly defined. The programs are also free from any requirements, otherwise their programs are provided voluntarily. Second, unlike Bank of America, the bank emphasizes on cultivating its employees and it can lead to improve its service for the customers. Third, unlike Bank of America, the customers are free from frustration by waiting in a long line. Lastly, the most significant difference is the relationship between the bank and the customers. Their relations are so tightly related each other. The bank does not just providing the service but they also listens their customers voice. Since Citizens Bank is new, therefore it is way too early to evaluate their community contributions. But I think their concept of corporate social responsibility is a trustworthy. I do not have any thing to prove it, but the based on my knowledge, the concept is reliable. On the other hand, I was curious why they decide to be a virtual bank. To find out their purposes, I attempted telephone interview with the person in charge and she told me that the purpose is for customerıs convenience. I tried to think if there are any other reasons and I made two assumptions. My first assumption is that the bank might attempt to expand their market. This assumption came up to my mind, because I found that its parent company can operate only in certain areas, due to the growth constraints of its charter. It is needless to say that the parent company is free from the constraints by having virtually operated subsidiary. Another assumption is that the bank may seek the future market place. Due to the rapid progress of computer technology, this type of bank may expand in near future. Conclusion: Evaluate corporate behavior is very difficult, especially if it is an issue of social responsibility, because there is no official guidelines to evaluate them. Evaluation also depends on an individualıs point of view. One person might think that a bank does business in a socially responsible manner, but other person may think the opposite. Therefore, the present evaluation for these two companies may differ from otherıs. These evaluations are based on knowledge of corporate social responsibility and the researched data. Bank of America was on the right track when A. P. Giannini started his business, but as the bank grew, it headed in a different direction. I am not denying all of its community commitments, but most of their programs and lending are designed for profitability. Although those programs and lending were not charitable contributions, communities got benefit from them. Then is it socially responsible manner? The answer is all depends on your perspectives. It is unclear that the bank felt the needs to change itself or not, the bank has attempted to reform its impersonal image. It is almost two years since the reform, almost every customers have not yet recognized any changes. Only one out of ten people who cooperated the survey answered that the bank has changed. Since this attempt has just begun last year, it may take some time to recognize. Citizens Bankıs concept of corporate social responsibility is totally different from that of Bank of Americaıs. Their priority is what they can do for the customers but not what they do to them. Even though the bank is new, their policies and concept of corporate responsibility are very reliable. We might have to wait some years to evaluate their behavior, but if the bank can maintain its current behavior, it would take the initiative in community contribution. Throughout this project I found out the significance of those banks contributions, because any contributions, no matter what the purpose is, can help hundreds and thousands of people. I also found many good and bad relationships between corporations and communities. It is difficult to get rid of all the bad relationships, but it is not impossible to make a change. REFERENCES 1. Clifford, Frank. ³Sprawlıs costs hurting state.² Los Angeles Times. 31 Jan 1995: A3. 2. Elliott, Stuart. ³Bank of America is put in review.² New York Times. 20 Nov 1996: C5, D5. 3. Lee, Don. ³BofA to extend health benefits to unmarried partners.² Los Angeles Times. 11 Mar 1997: D1. 4. ³Bank of America to cover partners of gay employees.² New York Times. 11 Mar 1997: D4. 5. ³Bank of America to close 33 more branches.² Los Angeles Times. 22 Mar 1997:D2. 6. ³Planting money at the roots.² Editorial. Los Angeles Times. 25 Sept 1997:B8. 7. Flanigan, James. ³BofA pledge isnıt charity but market development.² Los Angeles Times. 28 Sept 1997: D1. 8. Gellene, Denise. ³BofA tries to soften its tough image.² Los Angeles Times. 7 Oct 1997: D2. 9. Elliott, Stuart. ³Campaigns paint a new, friendly image for corporations.² New York Times. 7 Oct 1997: C9. 10. Mulligan, Thomas S.; Vrana, Debora. ³B of A outrines plans for merger with NationsBank.² Los Angeles Times. 14 April 1998: A1. 11. Kristof, Kathy M. ³How will bank merger affect your accounts?² Los Angeles Times. 14 April 1998: A16. 12. ³NationsBank merger with BankAmerica wins justice approval.² Wall Street Journal. 17 Aug 1998: C17, B2. 13. ³Bank of America settles suits from California.² New York Times. 13 Nov 1998: C5. 14. Gnizda, Robert. ³Dismal record for minorities.² Business and Society Review, n81 (Spring 1992): 26-28. 15. Carroll, Archie B. ³The four faces of corporate citizenship.² Business and Society Review, n100-1 (Winter 1998): 1-7. 16. Stanwick, Peter.; Stanwick, Sarah D. ³The relationship between corporate social performance, and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance.² Journal of Business Ethics. V17, n2 (15 Jan 1998): 195-204. 17. McCune, Jenny C. ³The Corporation in the community.² HR Focus v74, n3 (March 1997): 12-13. 18. Rosenberg, Richard M. ³Banking on the new America.² Vital Speeches of the Day. V61, n10 (1 March 1995): 317-320. 19. Besser, Terry L. ³The significance of community to business social responsibility.² Rural Sociology. V63, n3 (Fall 1998): 412-431. 20. Lyon, Jim. ³Canadaıs new virtual bank seeks real business.² Canadian Banker. V104, n3 (May/Jun 1997): 6-7. 21. Landolt, Sara Cox. ³Canadian credit union to launch a bank.² Credit Union Management. V19, n12 (Dec 1996): 8. 22. Steiner, George A. and John F. ³Business, Government, and Society.² 8th ed. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, INC. 1997. 104-128. 23. Davis, Mike. ³Political aftershocks.² Ecology of fear. 1st ed. New York: Henly Holt and Company, Inc. 1998. 47-53. 24. Davis, Mike. ³Greening the urban desert?.² Ecology of fear. 1st ed. New York: Henly Holt and Company, Inc. 1998. 77-86. 25. Davis, Mike. ³The last landscape.² Ecology of fear. 1st ed. New York: Henly Holt and Company, Inc. 1998. 86-91. 26. Davis, Mike. ³Half-moons of repression.² Ecology of fear. 1st ed. New York: Henly Holt and Company, Inc. 1998. 382-387. 27. Citizens Bank. Telephone interview. 16 Nov 1998. 28. Scherer, Robert F.; Owen, Crystal L. ³Social responsibility and market share.² Review of Business. V15, n1 (22 Jun 93): 11-16. http://www.iac-on-encarta.com 29. Bovet, Susan F. ³Make companies more socially responsible.² Public Relations Journal. V50, n8 (20 Oct 1994): 30-33. http://www.iac-on-encarta.com 30. Ojala, Marydee. ³Finding social responsible companies.ı Database. V17, n5 (20 Oct 1994): 86-90. http://www.iac-on-encarta.com 31. Citizens Bank of Canada Home Page. 1 Nov 1998. http://www.citizensbank.ca 32. Bank of America Home Page. 20 Oct 1998. http://www.bankamerica.com 33. Consumer Credit Counseling Service Home Page. 28 May 1998. http://www.cccs.net 34. The Council on Economic Priorities Home Page. 1998. http://www.cepnyc.org 35. QVM Home Page. Nov 1996. http://www.qvmresearch.com 36. ³1998 City of Los Angeles Economic & Demographic Information.² 9 July 1998. http://www.ci.la.ca.us 37. ³How good is your bank.² Consumer Reports Online. (Mar 1996) http://www.consumerreports.org 38. Taylor, Victoria. ³Reply from The Evergreen Foundation.² E-mail to The Evergreen Foundation. 16 Nov 1998. info@evergreen.ca 39. Doherty, Shannon. ³RE: Corporate Social Responsibility.² E-mail to Canadian Womenıs Foundation. 16 Nov 1998. Pboudreau@cdnwomen.org 40. Morii, Yasuhiro. Survey conducted from customers of Bank of America. 3 Dec 1998. APPENDIX (1) From: Shannon Doherty Date: Monday, November 30, 1998 6:33 AM To: 'yasumorii@worldnet.att.net' Subject: RE: Corporate Social Responsibility This message is in reply to your two questions to help you with your research on Citizens Bank. Question 1: I heard you are the recipient of 1997 Shared Interest Award.Do you think Citizens Bank has a solid reputation for leadership in corporate responsibility? If you think it's true, can you tell me why? The overall answer to your question is "YES" I think Citizen Bank is developing a solid reputation for leadership in the area of socially responsible companies. Their Shared Interest Fund is only in its second year, so is likely not well known yet in the corporate or non-profit community. What impresses me about Citizens Bank approach is that they are involving their customers in their corporate donation decisions. Customers can nominate charities in the bank's four interest areas and are involved in voting on the final four recommended charities to determine who receives the most funds. What I also like about Citizens Bank is that they "walk the talk". They are committed to NPO's (non-profit organizations) in all aspects of their business. For example - the four recipients from last year were recognized on their web site and in an advertising campaign for mortgages. The agency who did the advertising understood how to incorporate the non-profit in a credible way in their messages. All recipients received plaques to hang in our office and we were asked to send the bank information on our organization to distribute to their staff. We have had two visits from representatives of the Bank to update us on the programs they offer and encourage us to become a client. They have a definite focus on NPO's as a sector which is unique to the banking business. We were asked to participate on their selection panel for the year two grants...it was a great experience and showed me how much work and thinking goes into their Shared Interest Program. They are "unbiased" in their grant making and selection approach - favour groups that help foster positive and lasting social change. The panel was diverse and represented different bank and community constituents. For more information on their programs - suggest you check with their web site: www.citizensbank.ca Question 2: Can you tell me how the money, received from Citizens Bank has spent for? We received $2,500 from Citizens Bank last year. Of the four recommended charitable recipients, we received the fewest votes from members, hence the lowest amount of money. As we were the finalist in the economic self-reliance interest area, the funds received from the bank were allocated to our Economic Development Fund. This fund provides grants to projects initiated by women's organizations across the country. The goal of each project is to help low-income women become more economically independent through micro-enterprise activities. Hope this answers your research questions. If I can be of further assistance, please let me know. Thank you. (2) From: Victoria Taylor Date: Thursday, November 24, 1998 4:20 AM To: 'yasumorii@worldnet.att.net' Subject: Reply from the Evergreen Foundation Here are the answers to your questions: 1. I heard you are the recipient of 1997 Shared Interest Award. Do you think Citizens Bank has a solid reputation for leadership in corporate responsibility? If you think itıs true, can you tell me why? The bank is new (three years old?) and is definitely on the right track for developing its social responsibility record. What gives them a strong vote of credibility is that they started off with strong policies (and that the policies permeate all their operations) rather than trying to do what other banks are doing -- changing irresponsible practices into responsible ones. As the winner last year, the bank linked us in with the advertising and public relations campaign announcing their new mortgage program. A portion of every mortgage purchased will be passed along to the shared interest recipients. This is excellent exposure for us and shows they are really interested in promoting what we do - more than just giving money. They also highlighted Evergreen in an ad for their shared interest visa card in Green Teacher magazine - a key media venue for us given our involvement with schools and education. 2.. Can you tell me how the money, received from Citizens Bank, has spent for? The money went into our general operating budget to support our two programs - Common Grounds (community projects) and Learning Grounds (school ground projects). Our mission is to preserve and establish natural areas in the urban environment through education and action programs. Look at our web site www.evergreen.ca for more information about our various projects. Good luck with your project, Sincerely, Victoria Taylor Manager, Communications & Development The Evergreen Foundation Tel 416-596-1495 ext. 26 Fax 416-596-1443 355 Adelaide Street West, Suite 5A Toronto, Ontario M5V 1S2 www.evergreen.ca